Comments on: Why I’m sticking with WCAG1… for now

By: Yes I’m recommending WCAG2 now « Gian Wild

Yes I’m recommending WCAG2 now « Gian Wild — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:40:17 +0000

[...] wanting to know if they should be trying to comply with WCAG1 or WCAG2. They had read my article: Why I’m sticking with WCAG1… for now, and wanted to check if my opinion still held. I wrote that post a little over a year ago, and [...]

By: Peter

Peter — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:20:35 +0000

Thanks fr your thoughts Gina, we’re working on a project to make it WCAG2.0 compliant but having a think about it now.

Also subscribed to your RSS

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:37:31 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by CherylHardy: Why Gian Wild is sticking with WCAG1 for now http://bit.ly/b2Llr2...

By: Jason Grant

Jason Grant — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:02:41 +0000

I keep meaning to re-read WCAG2.0 as I really ought to be much more up to date with it than I am currently.

This is a fair enough post about WCAG1.0, especially when talking about Government services, which is fair enough.

By: Some links for light reading (23/03/10) | Max Design

Some links for light reading (23/03/10) | Max Design — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:13:34 +0000

[...] Why I’m sticking with WCAG1… for now [...]

By: Roger Hudson

Roger Hudson — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:27:48 +0000

Thanks Gian, food for thought, although I hold slightly differing views. I understand your reservations but hope we move to full WCAG2 AA asap. Like you, I am concerned about the lack of emphasis given to cognitive and learning disorders in WCAG2 and hope AGIMO and AHRC decide to require the AAA Success Criteria that go someway towards meeting these needs.

By: Gian

Gian — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:11:27 +0000

Good pick up – have changed accordingly

By: Kerry Webb

Kerry Webb — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:21:54 +0000

Fair comments, but I’d add one minor correction:

AHRC recommends WCAG 1 AA, rather than requires it.